RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



No much difference in China either, and we had IETF in Beijing even though China has the famous Great Fire Wall of Internet.

Jeffrey

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Recentattendees [mailto:recentattendees-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Barry Raveendran Greene
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 12:15 PM
> To: Ietf@Ietf. Org <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: recentattendees@xxxxxxxx; IETF Announcement List <ietf-
> announce@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF
> 100
> 
> 
> If this is being used as the justification, then South Korea must also be
> changed. Same problem.
> 
> > On May 25, 2016, at 3:08 PM, IAOC Chair <iaoc-chair@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Reasons for Cancellation of IETF 100 Meeting in Singapore, and the IAOC
> understands that to be:
> >
> > “    Singapore laws against same-sex relationships between men and
> >    preventing the recognition of same-sex marriages could create
> >    difficulties for same-sex partners and their children; these have
> >    discouraged affected members of our community from participating
> >    at the IETF meeting in November of 2017 and have also influenced
> >    others to decline to attend in principled solidarity with them.
> >
> >
> >    Accordingly, the IETF has decided to postpone indefinitely the
> meeting
> >    in Singapore and is pursuing alternative venues.”
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Recentattendees mailing list
> Recentattendees@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/recentattendees




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]