Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On May 25, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 5/25/16 11:39 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>> It appears that you and Ted do not believe that that is the right
>> question.   I think it is plain why you think that it is not the right
>> question.   However, by changing the topic, you are asserting that your
>> belief about what the right question is is more important than either
>> the IAOC's beliefs or the beliefs of other IETFers who believe that it
>> was a reasonable question.
> 
> I absolutely don't think "Can we have a successful meeting in
> Singapore" is the right question.  "We" can have a very
> successful meeting, depending on the value of "we."
> 
> So, when we talk about "we," who's included?
> 

I’m do not want the “we” to depend on gender, race, color, religion, age, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression, or marital status. 
 

> Melinda
> 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]