Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > 2/ what to do with IETF 100/Singapore

...

    > And, we need to make a decision about IETF 100 quickly.

    > So, to be clear, whatever we decided to do with Singapore for IETF 100
    > will NOT be a statement about whether we ever meet in Singapore again,
    > or never meet in Singapore again (depending on which way the decision
    > goes).

I'd like to remind that this meeting is in November, which is when nomcom
interviews.

I don't feel the IAOC has taken enough account of this in the past, and I
don't feel that the choice for IETF100 took this well enough into account.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]