JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > A few years ago, Thank you for stipulating "a few years ago". Spammers have learned a lot in the last few years. > I???ve managed to get a customer out of spamhaus, despite having sent > a SPAM because a bot, etc. In this case, there is _no_ evidence of a bot among my users. > I was able to find all the info about how to proceed in their web > site, apply to clean, etc. When is the last time you tried? Spamhaus has become more paranoid; and several features of their website aren't functioning well right now. (Not to mention their preference for users blindly enabling all javascript...) > Same with other similar DNS-BLs Actually spamhaus has a better-than-average reputation. It is _not_ the "same" with the average DNSBLs. > I think if you???re ???clean??? you should have not problem, "clean" by whose definition? Nowadays, it's not even a publicly-available definition! > and we can choose which DNS-BL to apply. I refuse to feed a flame-war here; except to say we _won't_ reach a useful rough-consensus without excluding too many contributors (and probably won't reach rough-consensus at all). > If we have from the community negative reports about bad-behaviours > from any of those DNS-BLs for example. Again, how much are you contributing to the costs of what you ask? -- John Leslie <john@xxxxxxx>