Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The UK filter is an "opt out" filter, and I assume that we (the IETF) opted out.   Even the "opt out" blocking is voluntary at present--an ISP is not required by law to have a filter, but in practice the big ones do.

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 3:19 PM, John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>The IETF has a meeting network requirements document that specifies a
>>number of parameters which includes no blocking.
>
> In London in 2014, do you know whether we were behind the national
> child porn filters?
>
> R's,
> John

I am not sure that they actually filter.

I think it rather more likely that if you were to surf to
kiddieporn.com from the Hilton Metropole, that you would find Mr Plod
knocking on your hotel room door 15 minutes later. That being the
driving time from New Scotland Yard.



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]