On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Michael StJohns wrote: > > This surprises me - "this has been a condition placed on hosts...". Could you > enlighten us as to which [and I'll try to be precise here] other IETFs had a > condition where the content accessible by the IETF network was markedly > different from the content of say the network at a local Starbuck's equivalent > wifi hot spot just down the street from the IETF and where that was mandated > by the hosts and/or local laws? I mean besides Beijing? Key words "markedly > different" and "content accessible". > > Mike > The IETF has a meeting network requirements document that specifies a number of parameters which includes no blocking. Markedly different in terms of content may not apply in most places, reasonable bandwidth most certainly does, as does port restrictions (usually by stupid configuration by clueless operators). And if you've ever stayed in some random hotel you will know what I mean. Ole