Re: Concerns about Singapore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/9/2016 8:05 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
yes, we tried that.  My impression is that there were two changes we
made, one was known in advance (closed network)
the ietf network in beijing was open as normal, thanks to the work of
many.  it had registration, as had maastricht.  and we have passwording
now.
Most of these things are not like the others:

We have ietf/ietf now - mainly for the benefit of the individual users (per client encryption keys), not the per user userid/password that we had in Beijing that was only available to registered attendees.

Calling the Beijing meeting network open isn't really correct - we had a reverse VPN to the Internet as it exists outside of the PRC.

We did registration in Maastricht simply to figure out the details before we got to Beijing - I'm fairly confident that Maastricht wouldn't have been different from the previous IETF's without the upcoming Beijing meeting.

the other was unknown (badges being checked)
cf. rfid discussion in hiroshima.  checking badges has a varied history.
beijing was conservative.

randy


Beijing was the first and only time I can think of where the hotel/host provided us with guards (excepting watchmen for the terminal room). It was also the first time that said guards actually kept out someone with a valid conference badge. Granted, the badge did not have the holders name on it, but it's really never been the IETF's policy to be overly concerned about who shows up as long as they are minimally dressed, not disruptive to the process and have attained reasonable standards of hygiene. And even those standards have been waived at times.

I'll also note that we neither asked for the guards nor were asked for consent for the guards to be placed. [I believe the previous statement to be true, but its possible that I was misinformed.]

It's a little late for this, but I'm suddenly wondering what percentage of the on-site registrants in Beijing were local, and how that percentage compares with other meetings.

In any event, each location we've been to has had a challenge or two that we've either ignored or overcome. Some candidate places will have challenges that we can neither ignore or overcome and should hopefully be down-selected in the meeting planning process.

Later, Mike





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]