Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think this is too general and judgmental. Suggestion:
> 3. A new reason to challenge a selection is that a specific member
> who has not attended three of the last five meetings of the IETF
> does not have enough recent participation of any kind to be an
> effective member of the NomCom. Such a challenge must be
> accompanied by a specific explanation of why the challenger
> considers this to be the case.
Is this challenge public?
I think that it is, but I'm not certain if all of it is public.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature