On 2 Feb 2016, at 22:19, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote:
Ron wrote:
And we are specifically not proposing to give *anyone*, open source
or
otherwise, "the option to take an RFC and “run with it”" ...
We're trying to find consensus on the best way to apply BCP 78 and
the
options outlined in RFC 5377 to the needs of this document, in a way
that best matches the needs of its intended users to the best
interests
of the IETF.
It seems to me like putting a BSD copyright header in an XML comment
at the top of the XML source file and dropping Section 13 from the
draft would resolve all of the issues, if everyone agrees that is an
acceptable thing to do. Ron?
I think that's acceptable in theory. In practice, keep in mind that if
someone uses xml2rfc to render the text, it's going to create IETF
headers and boilerplate, at least if the "external" version of the XML
uses the same settings.
That's probably not what you want, regardless of whether the section 13
language stays or goes.
How did this end up working for 6716?
Ben.