Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > That seems worth a bit more discussion. I'd always naively assumed that BCP38 was
    > scalable since all it appears to need is a prefix match, and routers are very
    > good at matching prefixes; it's just that they don't normally match the source
    > prefix. Could some router-vendor person comment on this?

It's also really really really cheap to do in the CMTS or PPP concentrator,
where for IPv4, it's often not even a "prefix" machine, but a /32 match.

IPv6 with PD makes it potentially a list...

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]