Leif Johansson <leifj@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> Is this connected to the fact that not even people developing standards
>> use very same standards?
> The problem is that we don't have enough dogs on our tasting panels: we
> need to get more ops folks directly & actively involved in the IETF.
We've said that for years.
My take from what Patrik said is different:
- we need to demand that people who participate in the IETF process use
more of the specifications that we write.
What if ipv6@xxxxxxxx and all of the 6*@ietf.org WG lists simply didn't
accept email over IPv4?
What if they rejected email that was text/plain with lines longer than 80
characters long? (or 72 or 77, or..)
As the owner of a technology business, I regularly get emails (often with
resume attached), offering me the service to redesign my web site.
Strangely, few of them actually *have* a web site.
I think that Patrik is saying the same thing of the IETF.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature