Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Skickat från min iPhone

> 31 dec. 2015 kl. 18:04 skrev Jared Mauch <jared@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> 
>> On Dec 31, 2015, at 5:00 AM, Leif Johansson <leifj@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> On 2015-12-31 06:16, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>>> Is this connected to the fact that not even people developing standards
>>> use very same standards?
>> 
>> The problem is that we don't have enough dogs on our tasting panels: we
>> need to get more ops folks directly & actively involved in the IETF.
>> 
>> Examining some of our success stories I suspect we'd find extensive
>> involvement from operations in every case.
> 
> Sadly that’s not the case here.
> 
> The reason we (as an operator) can’t use BCP-38 is the vendor hardware can’t do it at line-rate and the performance hit is too much to sustain.
> 
> Sorry to disappoint.  We even dropped it as a requirement in 2015 because it was clear the gap was getting wider not narrower.
> 
> Happy to discuss in person in BA or anywhere else we end up at the same time.
> 
> - Jared

I dunno if that is true or not but in either case you just proved my point.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]