Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16 Dec 2015, at 15:22, Masataka Ohta wrote:

> But, it is stupid to forbid "https://example.com"; and force using
> "https://www.example.com";, which means, in a long run, a domain
> will support a lot of application protocols.

This is why the URI would be:

_http._tcp.example.com.     IN URI 1 1 "https://www.example.com/";
_http._tcp.www.example.com. IN URI 1 1 "https://www.example.com/";

Etc...

   Patrik

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]