Re: Checksum at IP layer - is it even needed ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16 December 2015 at 15:00, Masataka Ohta
<mohta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That is a fatal defect of SRVINFO (and URI), because, if a domain
> support 100 services with 2 transport protocols, there are 200
> RRs, all of which must be replied for a single query, which is
> unacceptably inefficient, which is why it is necessary to use a
> service specific domain name for each service.

Can and must are different things. Just because you can, does not mean
you should, must less that you must. Saying proposal is bad, because
you can do stupid things with it, is bizarre. I can have arbitrary
many A records for a name, does this mean A RR is bad as well? How is
SRV stopping you from creating stupidly large responses?


-- 
  ++ytti




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]