On 12/10/15 5:32 PM, Dave Crocker wrote: > On 12/10/2015 5:00 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: >> I think this topic may be not appropriate for this list, unless it is submitted as an IETF ID. > I'm always glad to see active seargant-at-arms efforts, attending to > mailing list propriety. > > But I cannot guess at the basis for claiming Eromenko's posting was > inappropriate. What policy or documented practice does it violate? > > I am not aware of any IETF or ietf mailing list requirement that a new > topic first have an I-D before it is 'proper' to discuss it. +1. It used to be the case where we could actually have substantive discussions on this list. Eliot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature