Hi On 12/10/15 5:56 PM, Dave Crocker wrote: > Mostly quite quite a nice Statement. Comments: >> Interim face-to-face meetings can consume a lot of community resources, including travel costs and time of participants. > After this, add something like: > > This makes participation in an interim meeting far less inclusive > than is possible through a mailing list. > > > Virtual interim: > > I suggest setting the bar at two meetings before needing careful > justification, rather than four. In other words, as soon as it really > does move into being a series, it needs justification. Largely agree. I note that we have an extended period between November and April, and could easily see more than two calls in some WGs going on. In fact I would hope they would if they are needed. Not sure how to tweak that tho. > > One week notification is not enough. Given the vagaries of people's > schedules, notice needs to be longer. Two seems a minimum. > Emphatically agree. Eliot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature