RE: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Russ,

Thanks a lot for your review and good observations.
Please see my comments in line.

Best regards,
Yuanlong

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 1:28 AM
> To: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree.all@xxxxxxxx
> Cc: IETF Gen-ART; IETF
> Subject: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-10
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
> the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD
> before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-10
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review Date: 2015-11-13
> IETF LC End Date: 2015-11-24
> IESG Telechat date: unknown
> 
> Summary:  Almost Ready
> 
> 
> Major Concerns: None
> 
> 
> Minor Concerns:
> 
> Sections 4.1 and 5.3.1 inclues a reference to [802.1Q-2011].  Should this be
> the 2014 version of the document?  If not, please add the informative
> reference for [802.1Q-2011].
> 
[YJ] Yes, all these should refer to [802.1Q-2014].

> 
> Other Editorial Comments:
> 
> The Abstract should appear on the title page.
> 
[YJ] OK.

> Section 3 needs a reference for MEF 6.1:
> s/Specification MEF 6.1/Specification MEF 6.1 [MEF6.1]/ Also, [MEF6.1]
> needs to be added as a normative reference.
> 
[YJ] All these will be updated to MEF 6.2.

> Section 3 needs a reference for IEEE 802.1Q-2003:
> s/B.1.3 of IEEE 802.1Q-2003/B.1.3 of IEEE 802.1Q-2003 [802.1Q-2003]/ Also,
> please add an informative reference for [802.1Q-2003].
> 
[YJ] Yes, we will add an informative reference for [802.1Q-2003].

> Third level section headings do not have space between the section number
> and the section title.  For example:
> s/5.3.1.PW Processing/5.3.1. PW Processing/
> 
[YJ] OK.

> In Fig 4, there is room to shift the figure to the right, this will allow the "AC"
> labels to fit better on the left:
> 
>               +----------------------------------------+
>               |           VPLS-capable PE model        |
>               |   +---------------+          +------+  |
>               |   |               |==========|TVSI-1|------------
>    +---+  AC  |   |               ------------      |------------ PWs
>    |CE |----------|     Bridge    ------------      |------------
>    +---+      |   |               | Root &   +------+  |
>               |   |     Module    | Leaf VLAN   o      |
>               |   |               |             o      |
>               |   |               |             o      |
>               |   |               |             o      |
>               |   |               |             o      |
>    +---+  AC  |   |               |   VLAN-n +------+  |
>    |CE |----------|               ------------VSI-n |-------------
>    +---+      |   |               |==========|      |------------- PWs
>               |   |               |     ^    |      |-------------
>               |   +---------------+     |    +------+  |
>               |                         |              |
>               +-------------------------|--------------+
>                             LAN emulation Interface
> 
>           Figure 4  A VPLS PE Model for E-Tree with a Single T-VSI


[YJ] OK.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]