Re: Remote participation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 One thought:

In several countries, 4G mobile phones (including in "tethered hotspot"
mode) give adequate bandwidth for a WebRTC call.

If the corporate firewall can't be bothered to behave decently, the
answer may be to .... pick up the phone.

On 11/02/2015 10:44 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Simon Pietro Romano <spromano@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>     > this was an unlucky case.  The remote presenter had made the test and
>     > he had indeed reported that he could not make any video (from his work
>     > location), whereas he could do “good enough” audio, due to a slow (and
>     > firewalled) network connection.  My personal feeling is that we should
>     > avoid this kind of situations and perhaps ask the presenters to either
>     > find a better connection or delegate some of the local participants, or
>     > simply throw in the towel. Though, I don’t think we (i.e., the Meetecho
>
> I agree: especially when the issue is a firewall outside of the presenter's
> control, the presenter should be told to move somewhere else.
>
> Further: could the echo test produce a log of ports
>          attempted/succeeded/failed, and errors (ICMPs/etc) received?
> It would be nice if we could make it easier to report the issue to "IT",
> as presumably people are doing this kind of thing with the blessing of their
> employer, and so they should get supported.
>
> It also seems that the decision to present remotely, and not to travel is
> usually made 2-3 months in advance, and so really there is no excuse to not
> having things working in that amount of time.
>
> (Of course, there are exceptions where people are unable to travel due to
> last minute issues) 
>
>


-- 
Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]