Hi, let me chime in on this. I’m copy-pasting below the “standard” message we send to each potential remote presenter: Dear $PRESENTER, you're getting this mail as the chairs indicated you will be presenting whether or not they are in the right condition to make a remote presentation. This almost always works, as witnessed by the 5 presentations (plus 4 “injections” from the virtual queue) we had so far and which worked like a charm. If you are referring, as I can figure out, to today’s CCAMP session, this was an unlucky case. The remote presenter had made the test and he had indeed reported that he could not make any video (from his work location), whereas he could do “good enough” audio, due to a slow (and firewalled) network connection. My personal feeling is that we should avoid this kind of situations and perhaps ask the presenters to either find a better connection or delegate some of the local participants, or simply throw in the towel. Though, I don’t think we (i.e., the Meetecho team) can take on the responsibility for this choice. That’s why we always keep WG chairs in the loop for all our e-mail exchanges with prospective remotees. If you believe we should adopt a different policy, just let us know. We’re obviously open to discussion and ready to take your savvy advice. Thanks for your feedback! Simon
_\\|//_ ( O-O ) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o00~~(_)~~00o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Simon Pietro Romano Universita' di Napoli Federico II Computer Engineering Department Phone: +39 081 7683823 -- Fax: +39 081 7683816 e-mail: spromano@xxxxxxxx <<Molti mi dicono che lo scoraggiamento è l'alibi degli idioti. Ci rifletto un istante; e mi scoraggio>>. Magritte. oooO ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~( )~~~ Oooo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \ ( ( ) \_) ) / (_/ |