Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi -

>From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx>
>Sent: Oct 20, 2015 12:35 PM
>To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@xxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: IETF <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?
>
>Unless I missed a rather major political event, "retired" is not an
>organization you can be affiliated with.  Maybe I should put in
>"married" there next time?  (Can't put in "protestant", unfortunately.)

Seems like another way of saying that participation by us older
folks is unwelcome, as well as a way of discouraging participation
by independent contributors.  I prefer "retired" to "none" because
the former is more effective at keeping the headhunters at bay.

>[I remember vividly when someone who was between jobs created almost an
>international incident at a DIN meeting -- she made a little joke and
>filled in the organization field in the meeting roster with "housewife".

That's a perfectly legitimate occupation, and treating it as
a joke seems rather disrespectful of the people who find that
as their calling.

Randy




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]