--On Sunday, July 26, 2015 11:17 AM -0400 Ted Lemon
<ted.lemon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +1. It was certainly an eye-opener for me, although I did
> have some pretty good experiences with the camera some of the
> time, which suggests to me that it is possible to do it in a
> way that's satisfying for remote participants.
I've said this before: the Meetecho folks do a really superb job
given resources and circumstances. It is, IMO, time that we
recognize the importance of remote participation sufficiently to
as hard questions about what advantages would come from a change
in the resource balance. That includes asking how much it would
hurt us or increase risk to reduce the number of different
remote participation options and make a long-term commitment to
Meetecho.
john