On 25 Jul 2015, at 0:31, John Levine wrote: > For example, there is a lot of old > CPE that leaks queries for .BELKIN. But maybe if a TLD application > were from the same company that made the leaky devices, that would be > OK. Related to this, .BELKIN is a special case where whoever makes a judgement can base the judgement on SAC-045. If this is what you are saying, then I claim you say that "the basis for a 'no' is some report from someone else [who?] that say something is different from something else", or? Patrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature