inline Simon Josefsson wrote: > Christian de Larrinaga <cdel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Any chance of adding some words to the effect that RFCs are free both as >> in gratis and in the freedom sense? > > Makes sense, but be careful with words. RFCs aren't free in all freedom > senses, for example you can't even include them in FOSS projects since > RFCs aren't licensed freely enough. > > /Simon > Indeed a good clarification. I wasn't referring to the content but access to and use of the RFCs. C >> That should dispel any views that this is more than a metadata play >> for academic brownie points. >> >> Funny though isn't it.. back with CNRI again. >> >> Christian >> >> >> >> >> >> Brian E Carpenter wrote: >>> Stephane, >>> >>> Seriously? >>> >>> "if we want something widely recognized in the information and >>> documentation world" the only realistic answer today is DOIs. >>> >>> Regards >>> Brian Carpenter >>> >> >> Christian de Larrinaga FBCS, CITP, >> ------------------------- >> @ FirstHand >> ------------------------- >> +44 7989 386778 >> cdel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> ------------------------- >> >> -- Christian de Larrinaga FBCS, CITP, ------------------------- @ FirstHand ------------------------- +44 7989 386778 cdel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -------------------------