Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian de Larrinaga <cdel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Any chance of adding some words to the effect that RFCs are free both as
> in gratis and in the freedom sense?

Makes sense, but be careful with words.  RFCs aren't free in all freedom
senses, for example you can't even include them in FOSS projects since
RFCs aren't licensed freely enough.

/Simon

> That should dispel any views that this is more than a metadata play
> for academic brownie points.
>
> Funny though isn't it.. back with CNRI again.
>
> Christian
>
>
>
>
>
> Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Stephane,
>> 
>> Seriously?
>> 
>> "if we want something widely recognized in the information and
>> documentation world" the only realistic answer today is DOIs.
>> 
>> Regards
>>    Brian Carpenter
>> 
>
>
> Christian de Larrinaga  FBCS, CITP,
> -------------------------
> @ FirstHand
> -------------------------
> +44 7989 386778
> cdel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> -------------------------
>
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]