Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 2, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well I think the original point here is 'eat the dog food'

We fully disagree that that was the "original point". The original point was that encrypted email from the IETF is good. Joe specifically requested that we not get into a dogfood discussion so that he doesn't fall off his chair.

--Paul Hoffman

What he actually did was ask us not to have an S/MIME vs OpenPGP editor war. Which is fine as neither works well enough.

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]