Hi Joe, On 2015-04-22 18:34, Joe Hildebrand wrote: >> On Apr 22, 2015, at 7:56 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Using "1em" seems semantically better than stating a specific size. On my browser, "1em" also has a more pleasing visual effect for me. > > Paul hints at an interesting line of reasoning here. What we're actually looking for is "responsive typography", a combination of relative sizes with the default initial sizes chosen based on CSS @media queries. Some starting points for consideration: > > http://typecast.com/blog/a-more-modern-scale-for-web-typography > https://bugsnag.com/blog/responsive-typography-with-rems > http://codeitdown.com/responsive-font-size-css/ Thanks. I'll try to find time to read and apply. Regards, Henrik