Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/6/15, 4:47 PM, "Robert Sparks" <rjsparks@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>We are also continuing to work on improving the issues that started the
>threads sharing the Subject of this message at a high priority.

My other reply (albeit hidden under my signature which I stupidly forgot
to remove from the top of the message) quotes a part of a previous message
implying that this was already fixed, but I am still receiving messages
sent to e.g. draft-ietf-bess-orf-covering-prefixes.all@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx that
are forwarding to bess@xxxxxxxx without adding that address to the To:
field. Is this still in the process of being fixed, or do you want
examples of this because it's supposed to be fixed? It is unclear from
your previous message.

Thanks
Wes


This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]