I think that the security considerations in -10 are better than what we seem to be wordsmithing on the list. My preference is to call -10 good enough in this regard especially given that it is informational. I don't support a desire to reduce the strength of security warnings in the document, as I think John may be asking for. However personally I don' have the energy to really engage in much more of a discussion for this document. I think AS work is quite important, and I hope that happens at a time when I have energy to participate but it's far more important to me that it happen regardless of my participation.