1) I suggest the words "voting volunteer" be changed to "selecting volunteer" as there are votes, such as when to have the next meeting, which all members of the committee should participate in, and the words "non-voting member" have been mis-understood. 2) several of us suggest that the Chair for year X, be appointed prior to the the beginning of the Third IETF of year X-1. This permits the chair-elect/future-chair, to participate and learn about the process prior to starting. While this adds about 4 months to the duration of the chair duties, it probably reduces their stress sufficiently that they will live an extra year longer. 3) while the voting proceedures have been left up to the nomcom to agree on; it might be worth making it clear how and if the voting proceedure is agreed to, and if it can be amended. 4) Quorum says: > Only voting volunteers vote on a candidate selection. For a > candidate selection vote, a quorum is comprised of at least seven of > the voting volunteers. If a voting member is recalled, it would be nice if the quorum became six. It is also unclear if a voting volunteer refuses to cast a ballot, how things are to be counted. 5) recall says: >Regardless of the circumstances, if individual committee members can >not work out their differences between themselves, the entire >committee may be called upon to discuss and review the circumstances. >If a resolution is not forthcoming, a vote may be conducted. A >member may be recalled if at least a quorum of all committee members >agree, including the vote of the member being recalled. it would be nice to know if the "entire committee" includes liasons here. I think that it does, and some have agreed in the past. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature