Re: Proposed IESG structure change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Thursday, October 16, 2014 07:27 -0700 Jari Arkko
<jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
>> If we really have an issue with Apps and Area boundaries, then
>> let's address that issue.  There is, however, a chance that
>> the current Apps issue, the recent issues with Transport,
>> increasing homogeneity in the IESG and exclusion of people
>> who don't have strong corporate/organization support, and
>> questions about work migrating out of the IETF that used to
>> be obviously done here are part of a pattern.
> 
> I think both of those are issues. But I think addressing the
> latter and harder problem should not prevent us from
> addressing the former. The management structure needs to
> scale, but we still need the right areas, matching where the
> work is.

I completely agree.  Sorry if I was not clear.
   john







[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]