Re: Proposed IESG structure change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> If we really have an issue with Apps and Area boundaries, then
> let's address that issue.  There is, however, a chance that the
> current Apps issue, the recent issues with Transport, increasing
> homogeneity in the IESG and exclusion of people who don't have
> strong corporate/organization support, and questions about work
> migrating out of the IETF that used to be obviously done here
> are part of a pattern.

I think both of those are issues. But I think addressing the latter and harder problem
should not prevent us from addressing the former. The management structure needs
to scale, but we still need the right areas, matching where the work is.

Jari

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]