Re: History behind RFC numbers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Loa Anderson <loa@xxxxx>
Subject: Re: History behind RFC numbers
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 13:23:16 +0100
Archived-at: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xeF6n_c-8GWdYllqAjQNx6MbqPI
Cc: ietf <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <EF7ACE1A-4FDB-4379-84D9-562B8768205E@pi.nu>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2


On 02/10/14 12:53, Loa Anderson wrote:
> Can someone tell me what is broken?

IETF participant inability to refrain from commenting
on even the silliest proposals?

S

Follow-Ups:
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
  - From: t.p.

References:
- History behind RFC numbers
  - From: Hosnieh Rafiee
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
  - From: Abdussalam Baryun
- RE: History behind RFC numbers
  - From: Hosnieh Rafiee
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
  - From: Loa Anderson

Prev by Date: RE: History behind RFC numbers
Next by Date: Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
Previous by thread: Re: History behind RFC numbers
Next by thread: Re: History behind RFC numbers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]