> > Can someone tell me what is broken? > Nothing is broken. It is only some new ideas for pointing to RFCs and making the numbers meaningful so that when someone hear RFC xxxxxxx that person knows what its general area and what WGs it might be related to. Because at the moment the RFC numbers are only numbers that nobody can get more information only by knowing the number. Maybe just guess it might be for year 2014 or year 2013... because of its start but nothing more and sometimes the titles are really long and cannot be used as a reference.