Re: History behind RFC numbers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 9/29/14 4:47 AM, Hosnieh Rafiee wrote:
> Hi, Anybody knows the history behind RFC numbers. How it started
> and which document explained this. Sometimes I see it is not a
> sequential numbers for new RFCs. Thanks Best, Hosnieh
> 
> 

Topics like this one are better sent to the rfc-interest list
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest).  That
said, and to answer the later comments on this thread, creating a
unique cataloguing system for RFCs would, in my mind, provide very
little value versus how much work creating and maintaining such a
system would entail.  Meaningless numbers and a decent search engine
are a much saner approach for this kind of document series.


- -Heather Flanagan, RSE
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJULVIlAAoJEER/xjINbZoGNB8H/RPsEWIozCaS1EUbJzj58SUw
bnLkptwvGkuiGbynv4IVorEwzxKYmNG+LBeYA8Wqd554P0aPukxhkvVRAvxjwznA
DAmq2CN9wBjkWZfADvGa47fHK6iT5a4IQM4rQu5/ouSBy9YvJi59boNaFGBOuwBL
S+67OxpIVjJZUh8pMzLHSgWmZPE15ioMw0iiVbgmD6ZQFIW8g3YlAylYA3zpja4d
qjh6GhAcPV5z3nxaEpzaba57+Pf4RJ/PDTHY+5c/Nd4wm23nefREKADM69eBvYW8
q7JkdgoXDp4lg7cFzsB933jRTI89rp2zycqcc/Hbzn3MUUGdgri7BfmEgaRbjBU=
=C1HV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]