Re: Protocol Action: 'IKEv2 Fragmentation' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation-10.txt)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi -
>From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Sep 2, 2014 3:04 PM
>To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@xxxxxxxx>
>Cc: ipsecme mailing list <ipsec@xxxxxxxx>, ipsecme chair <ipsecme-chairs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Protocol Action: 'IKEv2 Fragmentation' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation-10.txt)
...
>Document Quality
>
>   Are there existing implementations of the protocol?  Have a 
>   significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
>   implement the specification?  Are there any reviewers that
>   merit special mention as having done a thorough review,
>   e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a
>   conclusion that the document had no substantive issues?  If
>   there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review,
>   what was its course (briefly)?  In the case of a Media Type
>   Review, on what date was the request posted?

It would have been nice if the announcement had included
answers to these questions.

Randy





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]