Re: draft discussion lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I don't think we need yet more mailing lists. Maybe it is just my
perception but it feels to me like there has been an explosion in the
number of non-WG mailing lists, most of which die due to lack of
participation.

Many drafts do have text up front on the first or second page inviting
comments to be set to some named mailing list or, alternatively, to
the authors. Requiring a "send comments to:" line in the first page
head or the like seems pretty reasonable to me.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx


On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2014-09-01 22:29, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> (On a practical note, when I have occasion to react to a random draft
>> that doesn't indicate a discussion venue, I ask the authors "Where is
>> this being discussed?")
>> ...
>
> +1
>
> I actually believe this should be a required part of an internet draft.
>
> Best regards, Julian





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]