Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>)
From: "Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP" <hbhotz@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 23:10:50 -0400
Archived-at: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BtQSSfn0JoHSxhM5BLHe5S5dhvM
Cc: saag@xxxxxxxx, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1408221524390.21571@multics.mit.edu>

On Aug 22, 2014, at 3:30 PM, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> I forget if I have opined on the list about OS vs. OCS or OE or other
> terms already, but I will just say that I prefer OS over any of the other
> proposals I have seen.

+1

Personal email.  hbhotz@xxxxxxx

References:
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC
  - From: Stephen Farrell
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC
  - From: Stephen Farrell
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC
  - From: Stephen Kent
- Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>)
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>)
  - From: Nico Williams
- Re: Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>)
  - From: Stephen Kent
- Re: Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>)
  - From: Stephen Farrell
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>)
  - From: Stephen Kent
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>)
  - From: Stephen Farrell
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>)
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>)
  - From: Stephen Kent
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>)
  - From: Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>)
  - From: Benjamin Kaduk

Prev by Date: Re: Is traffic analysis really a target (was Re: [saag] Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?)
Next by Date: Re: [saag] Is traffic analysis really a target (was Re: Is opportunistic unauthenticated encryption a waste of time?)
Previous by thread: Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>)
Next by thread: Re: [saag] Protocol Design Pattern (was Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]