Re: summary for Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A Null MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ned Freed <ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > Wrong group of codes. Those are status for mail systems to return, not
> > > the routing layer.
>
> > The point of null MX records it to explicitly say the address is invalid,
> > so an address status would seem to make sense.
>
> No, the point is to say that a host is invalid.

If you can't use them when the DNS says a mail domain is invalid then I
don't understand if it ever makes sense to use 5.1.2 or 5.1.8.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@xxxxxxxx>  http://dotat.at/
South-east Iceland: Southeasterly 4 or 5. Moderate. Occasional rain. Good,
occasionally poor.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]