Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

For the sake of comparison (and hopefully clarification), what's an example of an IANA action that does create work for the IETF, such that the IESG would object?

I think I gave one a couple of times: creating a registry that requires a designated expert (Expert Review or Specification Required) is what we've objected to.  It commits the IESG to appointing and manageing one or more DEs, without approval that comes with IETF consensus.


Sorry, I'd lost track of the thread.  You did indeed.

-MSK

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]