Wim - You are correct (of course)! Thanx for catching this. Les > -----Original Message----- > From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Henderickx, > Wim (Wim) > Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 9:58 PM > To: ietf@xxxxxxxx; IETF-Announce > Cc: isis-wg@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-isis-tlv-codepoints-00.txt> > (Updates to IS-IS TLV Codepoints Registry) to Proposed Standard > > Section 3 should be change -> Prefix Reachability sub-TLV Registry > 1 64-bit Administrative Tag Sub-TLV Y Y Y Y [RFC5130] -> typo > 64-bit admin tag has type 2 > > Should be: > > 2 64-bit Administrative Tag Sub-TLV Y Y Y Y [RFC5130] > > > > > On 11/07/14 23:19, "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > >The IESG has received a request from the IS-IS for IP Internets WG (isis) > >to consider the following document: > >- 'Updates to IS-IS TLV Codepoints Registry' > > <draft-ietf-isis-tlv-codepoints-00.txt> as Proposed Standard > > > >The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > >final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > >ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2014-07-25. Exceptionally, comments may be > >sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the > >beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > > >Abstract > > > > > > This document recommends some editorial changes to the IANA IS-IS TLV > > Codepoints registry to more accurately document the state of the > > protocol. It also defines early allocation procedures for codepoints > > managed by the registry. > > > > > > > > > > > >The file can be obtained via > >http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-tlv-codepoints/ > > > >IESG discussion can be tracked via > >http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-tlv-codepoints/ballot/ > > > > > >No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Isis-wg mailing list > Isis-wg@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg