Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language

To: Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 20:44:48 -0400
Archived-at: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9O4Xdbsq32rnxBTenvoX1E-PwrA
Cc: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@xxxxxxxxx>, IETF Mailing List <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <578A220C-1C4E-4475-A07E-34EA26D795BD@ripe.net>

On Mar 11, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> valide sultan .....

Valar dohaeris.

References:
- Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language
  - From: Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language
  - From: Russ Housley
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language
  - From: Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language
  - From: Russ Housley
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language
  - From: Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language
  - From: Gordon Lennox
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language
  - From: Dave Cridland
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language
  - From: Daniel Karrenberg