----- Original Message ----- From: "Ted Lemon" <ted.lemon@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: "t.p." <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "John Levine" <johnl@xxxxxxxxx>; <ietf@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2014 9:58 PM On Mar 9, 2014, at 5:16 PM, t.p. <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Any ideas? It's been discussed. I don't know how likely the problem is to get solved in the short term, but you are not the only person who has noticed it, and the desire to address is it keen indeed, so there is at least some hope. <tp> My preference would be to be able to edit the text - since that is the easiest to read and scan - into what is hopefully better English. Utilities exist that compare old and new text and highlight the changes, and are quite smart about resynchronising old and new where the changes are substantial. The next step would be to add 'accept change', 'reject change ' or 'use this text instead' option to create revised text, and then a further step to reverse that back into the XML. But I won't hold my breath:-) Tom Petch