Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide")

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide")
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 09:44:16 -0700
Archived-at: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-i-lPFvMAV1xnB39ghqhatrsr6M
Cc: IETF Chair <chair@xxxxxxxx>, IETF Disgust <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <m2k3c4g2xh.wl%randy@psg.com>

On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> I think you correctly describe a problem below. Well intended
> disruptive (or at least non-productive) postings are still

> disruptive/non-productive. And I think the right method is not to

> respond, and encourage others not to do it.

in the new istf, it is more important to be politically correct than
correct.

These are not mutually exclusive.

-MSK

Follow-Ups:
- RE: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide")
  - From: Eric Gray

References:
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide")
  - From: George, Wes
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide")
  - From: Randy Bush
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide")
  - From: IETF Chair
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide")
  - From: Randy Bush
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide")
  - From: Loa Andersson
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide")
  - From: Randy Bush

Prev by Date: Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions )
Next by Date: RE: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide")
Previous by thread: Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide")
Next by thread: RE: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide")
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]