RE: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide")

[Eric Gray <eric.gray@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

True, but it's the cases where they differ that involve hard work.

 

From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 12:44 PM
To: Randy Bush
Cc: IETF Chair; IETF Disgust
Subject: Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide")

 

On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> I think you correctly describe a problem below. Well intended
> disruptive (or at least non-productive) postings are still

> disruptive/non-productive. And I think the right method is not to

> respond, and encourage others not to do it.

in the new istf, it is more important to be politically correct than
correct.

 

These are not mutually exclusive.

-MSK