Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Adrian Farrel wrote:
>I think you are saying that *this* document should not lean on the IESG
>statement, but should be a standalone policy document.
>
>We believe we have achieved this by direct text rather than a normative
>reference.
>
>But we would be happy to hear exactly where we messed up.

I think the Internet-Draft should make the IESG statement redundant and
then the IESG statement should be obsoleted.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@xxxxxxxxxxxx · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]