> I think the Internet-Draft should make the IESG statement redundant and > then the IESG statement should be obsoleted. That is the plan I am following. (Or to be more exact, the eventual RFC will obsolete the statement…) Jari
> I think the Internet-Draft should make the IESG statement redundant and > then the IESG statement should be obsoleted. That is the plan I am following. (Or to be more exact, the eventual RFC will obsolete the statement…) Jari