Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Personal filtering is one thing, advocating it to others as a general practice is another. That is where the IETF or the WG process tends to go sour -- when it does appear to be a "private club," and "ignorance" and "Follow the Chieftain" syndrome is high. While it is obviously used to move an agenda forward, its not always pretty, nor fair when it happens and it hasn't been convincing of late the end results are often better. You may get your "RFC" but at what cost?

Thanks

Hector Santos, CTO
Santronics Software, Inc.

On 2/28/2014 10:17 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
On Feb 28, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Thomas Narten <narten@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reading every piece of IETF email definitely is not prioritizing
resources properly. Indeed, it is not uncommon to see threads that
exhibit properties often associated with DOS attacks.

+1

Nevertheless, procmail doesn't seem like the right answer.




--
HLS






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]