On 4 jan 2014, at 13:10, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > But any > requirement of "unlimited" would essentially require > variable-length addresses (or variable-length parameter fields > more generally, and that has always been considered a major > architectural decision. Exactly why I object to the term. You John explain why very well and also point out the bad decisions we made that we should learn from -- including the IPv6 decisions that I am extremely nervous over. Where early players once again get much larger address space than those arriving late. Patrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail