On 05/01/2014 01:10, John C Klensin wrote:
>
> --On Saturday, January 04, 2014 10:31 +0100 Patrik Fältström
> <paf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 4 jan 2014, at 09:29, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> One important change is that every future application
>>>> protocol proposal should be required to have an effectively
>>>> unlimited code space for assignment.
>>> Agree.
>> I do not agree regarding the term "unlimited".
>>
>> What is needed is that the specification do have a consequence
>> analysis regarding expansion of use.
>
> At least if it isn't unlimited, but I agree with Patrik.
There's some discussion of what can go wrong in RFC 6709, Section 4.4
on "Parameter Space Design".
Brian