On Jan 2, 2014, at 10:48 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@xxxxxxx> wrote: > The draft specifically calls out "legal but privacy-unfriendly purposes > by commercial enterprises" "no matter how benevolent some might consider > them to be" causing "through correlation with other communication > events, [revelation of] information the communicator did not intend to > be revealed"; that is a description of "behavioral advertising". It might be helpful to quote the text without strategic elisions! It's true that something like the G+1 button can be used for pervasive monitoring, but that's a bit different than saying that this document is specifically targeting Google and Google's general business model. The point is that if by happenstance certain applications like the G+1 or FB Like button become less valuable as a result of IETF being more proactive in preventing pervasive monitoring, that would be an acceptable outcome. Do you disagree with that?